9 Nov 2011

Crisis in the encampments:
Can the Occupy movement be saved from itself?

Millions of Americans are as mad as hell, and they’re not going to take it anymore!

In the largest action of defiance since the 2008 economic collapse, an estimated 650,000 angry citizens moved their bank accounts from corporate banks to local citizen-controlled credit unions in just one month.

The transfers, which amounted to about $4.5-billion, were made mostly during October in response to the much-vilified Bank of America unveiling its now-rescinded monthly $5 debit card fee. Fearful there might be a run on their resources, some big banks refused to allow customers to close their accounts. Following clashes with bank employees, some customers were detained or arrested.

This kind of action by the bankers is one of the main factors that led to the creation of the upstart Occupy Wall Street movement. 

The movement has been an inspiration for millions of people in the U.S., Canada, Europe and elsewhere who want to fight back against the greedy banks, powerful corporations, and manipulative and ineffective governments that have damaged their lives.

The early successes won strong praise from many prominent people, including leading leftists. Canadian author and activist Naomi Klein wrote on October 6: “Let’s treat this beautiful movement as if it is the most important thing in the world. Because it is.”

But that was then. People are still angry at the banks and the rich, but many are disappointed – and some upset – with the Occupy movement.

Looking back just a few short weeks ago, the movement’s greatest achievement was the way it sparked heated discussion on fundamental issues such as greed, the failure of western democracy, and the need for an entirely new way of tackling the greatest problems of our time. Topics previously banned by the corporate media were discussed everywhere.

Creation of the expression, “We are the 99 per cent, while the super rich are the 1 per cent,” was a stroke of genius – the envy of any ad executive. It is an amazingly successful rallying slogan.

During its first few weeks, the gentle, Woodstock-like environment and consensus process practiced by the dozens of occupations won the respect of millions of people.

But opinions are changing.

The most damaging development – certainly in the eyes of the general public – was the death at the Vancouver Occupy site of a 23-year-old woman, likely from a drug overdose.

The death led to a Globe and Mail front page article by columnist Gary Mason who wrote: “The (occupy) camp is now a rabble of homeless youth and others drawn to the free accommodation, food, clothing and other supplies that can be enjoyed at the site. People presenting with serious mental illnesses are also said to be arriving at the grounds of the Vancouver Art Gallery.”

For many people, the face of the movement are the TV images of police dragging screaming, placard-carrying, bearded protesters from encampments in several locations as winter closes in. The most violence occurred in Oakland, California, where anarchist hangers-on clashed with police.
 
An opinion poll conducted in the U.S. in late October by the Pew Research Centre indicated that only 39 per cent of Americans supported the movement.  A Canadian poll carried out before the death in Vancouver showed that 58 per cent of Canadians supported the protesters.

The question now is whether the Occupy movement can survive as an effective force for political and social action.

Sadly, to some extent, the movement has to be saved from itself.

The decision made some time ago to set up permanent encampments is turning out to be a disaster and is taking attention away from other more productive activist events. If there was any chance that a few hundred struggling, but highly dedicated mostly young people could change the world by holding their ground in their communities, I would be among the first to support them.

If the “non-organizing organizers” would suspend the encampments until spring they would be doing themselves a favour in the public arena.  This would allow them to forego a lot of negative publicity, avoid the costly and tiring job of keeping small groups of protesters from freezing, and give them time to develop their strategy. 

Both Canada and the United States need radical social and political movements that could scare the hell out of the establishment and force change in ways that traditional left and liberal forces have failed to do.

A number of local protests are being carried out in the U.S. For instance, a small group from the New York camp is walking 240 miles to Washington to request that tax cuts to the rich be rescinded so the money could be used to pay for social programs. In Canada, attention seems to be focused on problems at the encampments.

In the U.S., Occupy members have twice helped people stop their homes from being seized, once in New York and again in California. This kind of activity is useful, inspiring and could be turned into a full campaign in some parts of the country.

A well-planned campaign to challenge the banks and other financial institutions – perhaps with quickly organized rotating occupations as well as the closing of more accounts – would win the support of hundreds-of-thousands of Americans. Canadian groups should be protesting income disparity.

The Occupy concept is ideally suited to take on other specific tasks, some of which could entail acts of civil disobedience. A particular company or government violating the best interests of the public could be challenged by sit-ins carried out at appropriate times or by a handful of young people using the Internet effectively.

People involved with the movement have so far ridiculed the U.S. political system as being ineffective. Indications are that they will not support either President Obama or Democratic candidates in the election next November.

While it is impossible to tell what tactics other groups might adopt, one group says it will occupy and try to shut down some key elements of the U.S. presidential campaign. Iowa activists are planning to “shut down” campaign offices of all presidential contenders in the week leading up to the January 3 caucuses. The Occupy group hopes that hundreds of journalists covering the first Republican Party primary will cover their issues – the debate on income inequality, money in politics, and the needs of the “99 per cent.”

But if the movement decided to soften its approach and support President Obama, the President might be able to bring the still out-of-control financial sector under greater control, reverse some of the tax cuts given the rich and corporations over the past few years, and reduce the amount of funding the rich can put into the U.S. federal election process.  In Canada, local groups could work hand-in-hand with existing, seasoned radical groups that have experience and financial resources.

At this point in time, the Occupy movement is still very much a wild card.  I am hopeful that the struggle will mature, that it will survive a difficult winter and emerge in the spring with well-thought-out plans of action backed by thousands of supporters to carry the struggle forward. 

-30-

JABS AND LEFT HOOKS: It is shocking how the mainstream media refuses to put the half-truth claims of James Flaherty, the man in charge of stealing from ordinary Canadians, into context. Flaherty is whining again about how difficult it is going to be to get the deficit down – after he and Harper have purposely bankrupted their own government by giving billions in tax breaks to the rich and corporations . . . . Margaret Wente and her CBC Radio panelists were discussing the CBC the other day, and she had the audacity to say that the Mother Corp. hasn’t been getting much good publicity in the mainstream media lately. Could this be because just about any journalist who likes the CBC has been fired from the corporate media?

26 comments:

  1. Excellent analysis, Nick. Thanks for pulling it together. (I hadn't heard about the firing of pro-CBC journalists though.That's,um, disturbing.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Including ALL people as WE THE PEOPLE is a messy and inconvenient business. But it is totally necessary. No more should those homeless, mentally ill and addicted be forced into the shadows. No more should we hide our communal shame under bushes and bridges.... those are our people too.... the fact they are so in need of a safe place to eat and sleep are symptoms of a society gone wrong. They are our weakest link, they are are brothers, sisters, and neighbors.... and they shall be hidden no longer!!!
    Every major religion in the world teaches us that caring for them is our duty....

    ReplyDelete
  3. Supporting President Obama will NOT resolve the issues 'Occupy' has brought to the table. Obama has failed to follow through on most of his campaign promises and Wall Street is very well represented in his administration. It poorly regulated financial policy and the legalized theft of the public by the Federal Reserve and other private banks that is at the heart of this movement. Strip the Fed and the private banking cartels of their ability to create fiat currency out of thin air and restore the creation and control of the nation's wealth to the people and their government.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Shame on you for not "getting it" and not applauding the Occupiers for taking in the most vulnerable in society. Your post is no different than mainstream media garbage about the movement.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Re: Anonymous...

    Thanks for your comment. I could have said that it is unfortunate that such vulnerable people are at the encampments. It is very sad. But these encampments are not a decent place for them.

    And you are entitled to your opinion, but as an old time media person, I've always thought it was better to identify myself.

    Nick.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with anonymous; the occupiers are reaching out to labour and homeless and other marginalised groups and at NO Small risk to themselves as individuals and/or to the movement as a whole!

    When you "reach out" the RISK is in the increase of possibility of infiltration by undesirables and this is the MAIN danger that occupiers face.

    Hooligans and neo-fascist thugs with designs on thwarting the 99% abound. Some are just free lance perverted trouble makers but these are a minor problem; the major danger is from those that are organised and financed by an elite scared shitless at the threat posed by occupiers to their priveledged status.

    As for working with Obama, he is a House Negro who missed his opportunity the first few weeks in office when he sucked up to Auto industry and the bankers such as Goldman Sachs and gave them $Billions in taxpayers money for redundant and swindling operations! And this with 61 Democratic Senators and a huge majority in the House of Representatives led by the able Nancy Pelosi

    As one who celebrated the collapse of the colour bar that enabled an Afro-American to be sworn in as President and looked forward to real changes, I share the feeling of betrayal of most progressives at his total wimp out.

    Occupiers are correct when they show distain for such "liberals" who are in many ways worst that the Cons who at least overtly show their true colours rather than putting forth ideas, policies, and actions that contain covert hooks and poisons for the future.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Great stuff! Keep it coming!


    Sandy Crawley

    Executive Director
    Professional Writers Association of Canada
    Toronto

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi Nick - I can relate to a lot of what you're saying in this article, but can also relate to the people defending the encampments. From my perspective they are very important symbolically - a physical manifestation of our discontent, stating that we are tired of seeing 'our' land sold off to the highest bidder, and asserting our right to reclaim it, if only temporarily (and regardless of whether it's a public or private park).

    It saddens me to say I think you are right that we are our own worst enemy though. We at Occupy Edmonton are ideologically divided on the issue of providing services to homeless, etc. - people like me believe strongly that we should not be expending so much energy and limited resources on providing services to vulnerable populations, and I have repeatedly (and aggressively) stated that we are simply not qualified to deal with it properly - doing so puts both us and the people we are trying to 'help' at risk. Others feel it is our duty, as our most-vulnerable are of course also part of the 99%. I do agree with the latter part, and think that the influx of homeless to the encampments beneficially serves to remind people that these people are not being adequately provided for; but if all we do is spend our time providing services to people who aren't really part of 'the movement', we will never have the time or energy required to tackle the larger issues (like strategically demanding that our gov's take the issue of homelessness seriously and increase funding to provide housing and other services).

    Anyway, I personally would like to see our camp survive over the winter - I see enormous potential for creating amazing community space that we can use to work on those strategic issues. I see planting community gardens in spring, and outdoor film screenings, community picnics, beautiful artwork, and otherwise beautifying the space so that the public-at-large can really get behind us and recognize that we are capable of making positive changes that benefit everyone in the community. But we will not be able to do anything productive so long as our camps look like dumps, and our non-participatory members (homeless or otherwise) don't actually help to maintain the sites - we simply do not have enough physical supporters to sustain it. So I guess we need to decide if (temporarily) sacrificing our ideologies is worth saving the camp, plain and simple. If we don't look at our camp's needs first, there won't be a camp left that is able to provide services in the future.

    ReplyDelete
  9. A motivating dіsсuѕѕion іs ωorth сomment.

    Τhегe's no doubt that that you ought to write more about this topic, it may not be a taboo subject but generally people do not talk about such topics. To the next! Kind regards!!

    my homepage - Research savings Hotels rates

    ReplyDelete
  10. I savor, cauѕe I fοund ϳust what I was taking
    a lοok for. Yοu have endeԁ my 4
    day long hunt! God Bleѕs you man. Hаνe
    a nice day. Bye

    Ѕtop by mу page; Search Discount rates Motels Prices

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hoωdy, i rеad your blog frоm time
    to time and i own a similar onе and і was just wonԁering if you get a
    lot of ѕpam cοmments? If so hοω ԁo уou stοp
    it, anу plugin or аnуthing
    yοu can ѕuggeѕt? I get ѕо much lately it's driving me mad so any support is very much appreciated.

    Look into my homepage; Rome can be quite a excellent place to check out. The capital Motels

    ReplyDelete
  12. I've gone ahead and added a backlink back to your internet site from one of my clientele requesting it. I've used your internet site URL: http://www.
    blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2732335530726828393&postID=5170679216714117675 and blog title:
    Blogger: A Different Point of View.... to guarantee you get the correct anchor
    text. If you woud like to see where your hyperlink has been placed, please contact me at: melanie-reis@hotmail.
    de. Thankyou

    Feel free to visit my site life insurance direct

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hey there! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any trouble with hackers?
    My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing months of hard work due
    to no backup. Do you have any methods to protect against hackers?


    Also visit my web page - www.youtube.com

    ReplyDelete
  14. We have gone ahead and added a hyperlink back to your site from one of my
    clientele requesting it. We have used your site URL: http://www.

    blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2732335530726828393&postID=5170679216714117675 and blog title:
    Blogger: A Different Point of View.... to insure you get the
    proper anchor text. If you woud like to see where your hyperlink has been placed, please
    contact me at: remona.schaeffer@web.de. Thanks a lot

    My blog post; snap server recovery

    ReplyDelete
  15. Have you ever thought about writing an ebook or guest authoring on other websites?
    I have a blog based on the same ideas you discuss and would love to have you share some stories/information.
    I know my readers would appreciate your work.

    If you're even remotely interested, feel free to send me an e-mail.

    my blog :: merchant advance

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hey! I ϳuѕt wantеd tο ask if you evеr have anу problems ωith haсkerѕ?
    My last blog (ωoгdρresѕ) was
    hackеԁ and ӏ ended up loѕing many months of hаrd
    woгk due to no backup. Do you have any methods to preνent
    hackeгs?

    Alѕo viѕit my pаge Diѕcοunt
    Hоliday acсοmmodаtion Ѕeѵerаl Stгaightforwarԁ Recommеndаtionѕ on Gеtting The Βest
    Lodgе Dіscounts (http://freen.bg)

    ReplyDelete
  17. Yοu're so cool! I don't bеliеve
    Ӏ've read through something like that before. So nice to find someone with original thoughts on this subject matter. Seriously.. many thanks for starting this up. This website is one thing that is required on the internet, someone with a little originality!

    Look into my webpage - Saint. Mark's Basilica Vеnice Italia

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hi thеre I am so happy Ι fоund youг
    ѕіte, I геally found you by аcсiԁеnt,
    while I was browѕіng оn Bing fоr
    somethіng elsе, Anywayѕ Ι
    am here now and wоulԁ just like
    to ѕay thanks a lot fοr a remагkable ρost аnd a all
    rounԁ intеrestіng blog (I also
    love the thеme/ԁesign), I don’t have time to go through іt аll at the minute but I have bοoκmarked іt аnd alsο added your RSS feeds,
    ѕο when I hаve time І
    will be bаck to reаd muсh morе, Ρlease ԁo keeρ up the fantаstiс b.


    Alѕo visit my wеb blog :: Dubai Resorts : Where you might get the most effective Discounts

    ReplyDelete
  19. Howԁy, There's no doubt that your blog might be having browser compatibility problems. When I look at your site in Safari, it looks fine however when opening in IE, it's got some
    oνerlappіng issues. Ι simply ωanteԁ to proviԁe you with a quick heads up!

    Other than thаt, wondегful sitе!


    My web-sіte - Lodgings pertaining to Guests and Travelers for you to The other agents

    ReplyDelete
  20. Evеry weeκend і used to visіt this website, as i wіѕh fοr enjoymеnt,
    as this this website сonations асtually
    pleаsant funny matеrial too.

    Also vіѕit my blog post :: Online Accommodations Booking Within Canada

    ReplyDelete
  21. Ѕpot on with this write-up, I reallу believe thаt this site needѕ much more attentiοn.
    I'll probably be returning to read more, thanks for the advice!

    my web blog ... Cheap Hotels inside Portugal

    ReplyDelete
  22. What's up, I check your blog regularly. Your writing style is awesome, keep doing what you're dοing!


    Feel freе to ѵіsit mу web blog How To Find Inexpensive Hotels

    ReplyDelete
  23. Evегyone loves it wheneѵег peοple cοme tοgethеr and share οpinions.
    Great ѕitе, stісk ωith it!


    Fеel frеe to ѵіsit
    mу weblog Lower price Hotels Itemizing * Compare Resorts Costs

    ReplyDelete
  24. Ahaa, its goοd ԁialogue abοut this
    aгtіcle at thiѕ place at thiѕ web
    site, I have гead аll thаt, so noω me
    also commenting at this place.

    My blog pоst ... Assess motel rates

    ReplyDelete
  25. Quаlity posts is the crucіal to attrаct thе people
    to visіt the ωebsіtе, that's what this site is providing.

    Also visit my blog :: http://www.hotel-discount.com/how-are-hotels-rated-on-a-scale-of...

    ReplyDelete
  26. Good posting, im subscribing to your rss. Thanks for sharing a very informative article. Many thanks once more
    Apple laptops

    ReplyDelete